For the last few years, employees have had the upper hand in the job market. But now, power is back in the hands of employers. “The average worker said they had less than a 50% chance of finding a job in today’s economy, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With high unemployment (4.3%), “3 million employees say they hesitate to quit when job searches can drag on for months” noted a Fortune article.
AI puts the pressure on: Workers who may have once pledged loyalty to one company are now “having to deal with cuts to benefits and perks, if not mass layoffs, as AI advances and investors pressure companies to cut costs.” Return to office mandates are also reducing the hybrid work flexibility—leaving workers feeling less optimistic and incentivized.
Takeaway: Though on the surface operational, these shifts signal a deeper recalibration of the employer–employee contract. CHROs should be aware of this tension as efficiency plays in the short term may erode trust, equity perception, and long-term workforce commitment in the longer run.
Compliance is not engagement: Employees are tolerating changes but not endorsing them. For instance, “more than 70% of workers also predicted they would have the same or less bargaining power to push for flexible work policies in 2026 than in 2025,” a recent survey found. This perceived unfairness can outweigh the policy itself.
-
“Anytime we have an abrasion of justice, we are going to see lower motivation of our employees because we want things to feel fair,” said Jamie Shapiro, an organizational psychologist and CEO of the executive coaching company Connected EC.
The impact: As material perks decline, cultural equity must increase.
Repricing the cost of labor: Organizations are standardizing in-office requirements (≈3–5 days/week) while quietly tightening compensation structures and removing perks. “The era of employee leverage has ended,” Jasmine Escalera, a career expert said.
The impact: Return to office mandates or capping pay structures are not just an exercise of authority and cost considerations. They represent a systemic repricing of labor.
A productivity paradox: AI is increasing overall output and reportedly saving employees 1 hour of work per day. But the job itself may become harder when teams troubleshoot AI integrations and incorporate it into workflows.
The impact: This is a classic productivity paradox. Without recalibration of incentives, organizations risk disengagement. “When we don’t invest in our people, and we don’t care about their well-being, we actually get so much less out of them,” said Shapiro.
